IAFilm Productions

Independent Alternative Film
  Home > 6. Other Archives > Movie HOWTOs > Webcasting Experience.html

Note that this is a 2015 story. Our webcasting has advanced a lot since then, including what we have learned managing teaching and learning through the 2020 Covid Crisis.

Live Webcasting Experience. Beware eccentric temperamental technology! Pre-record if you can!


I thought Webcasting a live forum would be a lightweight fun thing to do. That we feed straight to Youtube while live switching between cameras saving on the editing workload of our usual multi-camera shoot. No! No! No! It was all drama to get a setup of temperamental software and hardware to work together and amazing that they did hold together for one hour at the appointed time. I can now compare webcasting with our usual event-filming method which is filming in real time with 3 video cameras then edit the result before uploading to "Youtube".

         The webcast preparation workload is way more than the workload of post-editing.

         The webcast is of lesser image and audio quality because of the limits of real-time uploading and processing.

For what we were doing, an indie mock talk show, we could get the same spontaneous live feeling by running uninterrupted with 3 cameras rolling, just like filming a concert. The live feeling would happen during recording maybe 2 days before it appears on "Youtube" which is totally good and OK.

So why even write a detailed article? Some of the tech observations and problem solving experiences do relate to other areas like webcasting for education and studio-style indie production. Our future selves, or other readers today, may have access to higher quality specialist systems like high speed internet connections combined with specialist high powered media servers.

In the meantime, if we absolutely must webcast then let us go into it with the idea that it is a medium which by its nature is not smooth and not clear - looking and sounding like early TV experiments of the 1930s and 1940s. That can have its own kind of artistic goodness, it is up to us to discover and use it in ways that work for what it is .... which of course we did!



I have been producing the indie movie, "Brave Love", based on a story by Katherine Mansfield (KM). In her diary for 12 Jan 1915, KM writes ".. finished the story Brave Love today ..".

100th anniversary! Do an event! On Google Plus I was seeing "Hangouts on Air" - wow! - democratisation of TV broadcasting! 2 things to celebrate with a webcast! I had experience with business videoconference calls 10 years ago and that was OK. Surely in 10 years the technology has progressed in exciting and interesting ways?

"Hangouts on Air" runs in your browser although it appears as a distinctive and separate popup application window. From your Google Plus home page, follow some obscure and difficult to find links to start it up. You can practice feeding webcam video and other content into the Hangouts window while it is waiting for you to click the button to go live. We set these up scheduled well in the future to practice and practice a lot.

The instructions say we can "invite" other Google Plus users into a "Hangouts on Air" session so they can join the discussion and appear via their webcams from their computers in other places. We could not get this to work. We needed to abandon any attempt to do this after only limited time on this case because of all the other challenges that became higher priority.

One of the biggest attraction of "Hangouts on Air" is the ease of viewing for the audience. The webcast appears as a Youtube video in your Youtube channel and for the audience it is like playing any Youtube video. At the end of the webcast, it saves itself and becomes a conventional Youtube video.

Challenge: video clips. Our webcast was in part a discussion about the making of our movie so we wanted to include video clips from the movie.

Hangouts has a control for including Youtube clips. This seemed like an excellent idea in theory. I thought this meant that the clip inserts itself via some kind of switchover on the Youtube servers. That way the clip would not need to struggle through the phone line and processing because it is already on Youtube in ready-to-view format. I could not get this to work in any sense. In most trials the audience watches me watching Youtube.

Hangouts has a control for viewing the desktop. I tried playing the clip on my screen then webcasting the screen. Looked OK, well the same low res image look of all webcasting. No audio unless I put the microphone near the speakers.

Tried "virtual webcam" software. I had audio problems eg an echo effect with "ManyCam". "SplitCam" worked. So this turned into a hybrid with "SplitCam" feeding "ManyCam" feeding "Google Hangouts".

Challenge: multi-camera:

I bought "ManyCam" which can vision-switch between many webcams and some other sources and present itself as a "virtual webcam" which you select as the input to "Google Hangouts".

"ManyCam" could not read the input from a video camera feeding AV-out via an "SMI Grabber" video digitiser. "SplitCam" could handle this so we had more of "SplitCam" feeding into "ManyCam" to provide one of the cameras - oh as well as the video clips, which made vision switching a complicated dance between "ManyCam" and "SplitCam" to fill in each other's gaps.

Challenge: remote active participation

Our remote guest Gerri told me that she had tried Hangouts and had difficulty with it so she preferred to use Skype. We were also unable to bring in guests on Hangouts on our trials. So we setup a separate laptop running Skype with a webcam and microphone pointing at it to record the on-screen Gerri. The simplest solution is often the best and most reliable!

A good move was to get our separate Skype computer on to the internet with a 4G cellphone. I was thinking that this would keep the demands of the Skype video call away from the ADSL phone line. My 4G cellphone had a ration of 1280 Meg of Internet for the month and this 1 hour Skype call used 420 Meg which was OK and survivable.

Challenge: setup 3 webcams useful as indie studio cameras

I had the idea that it would be good to use our usual video cameras as webcams. That would give our roaming operator the joy of optical zoom and a viewfinder. We did achieve this with a Canon Vixia HF R20 but only by taking the analogue video output and running that through a USB digitiser plugged into the main laptop. Very unreliable in all trial runs but - pleasant surprise - held together without crashing on the night.

I wasted a lot of time on trying to re-use older equipment that had served me well in the past. I realised early on we needed to keep resolution down to a modest 640 x 360 pixels. We don't need HD cameras. So out came my Panasonic MX-500 (aka PV-953), a cool old SD video camera. In 2003, camcorderinfo.com gave it a "Camcorder Of The Year" award. Unlike most new cameras, this one has a webcam mode! I downloaded the drivers - but - the drivers were 32 bit and my Windows is 64 bit and apparently cannot work with 32-bit drivers and it took way too long for me to discover this. Feedback to Microsoft - when you cannot support an old tech, then clearly say so in the error message. Mine was something like "Cannot find driver". I suggest it would be better to say something like "Cannot run 32-bit driver on this 64-bit operating system".

Similar sad story for the nice old "USB 350" webcam. I had preserved its CD disk from 10 years ago but it was not welcome in new-fangled Windows.

Could we run a 32-bit Windows? No - lots of barriers to that.


Well-cabled Canon - cabled with power cable and analogue video feed.

Screen Shot of ManyCam window. At lower right is the window for SplitCam feeding the digitised analogue feed from the Canon camera.


False Alarm!

Google Hangouts always showed our feed from other "virtual webcam" software as horizontally flipped - ie a mirror image. The result on Youtube was however correct and the flip effect was consistent all week so we just ignored this after some early worries.


Result - what did work.

- when I first downloaded and installed this "freeware" I found it was also "adware" and advertising an "adult entertainment" website. It also had a user interface that at a first quick look did not make sense. I immediately uninstalled it. It was only a few days later that while searching - desperately - for answers I found forum posts saying that SplitCam could work with the "SMI Grabber" and act as a helper for ManyCam etc. So I brought back SplitCam which made more sense on closer inspection. Splitcam also delivered video clip files into the webcast.

"SplitCam" in action, but not too much "action"(!)


- delivers vision switching with camera previews, ie real-time showtime editing. I had audio problems with video clip play but that may be due to the strange audio setup in my laptop which has given me grief in the past.

Google Hangouts on Air
- does work.We used it with a domestic ADSL phone line rated at about 1MBPS upload speed which is marginal. Video and Audio is obviously very compressed. In my opinion the user interface is eccentric - one of these current fashion things I do not like where the window has lots of open space, a few large controls, and the controls that I happen to need are the small obscure links that are difficult to find.

As I understand it, commercial webcasting would use high bitrate internet connections eg fibre-optic cables and run via rented specialist media server computer resources. To get a smooth clear result needs a lot of money, maybe of the order of thousands of dollars to setup? Let us therefore roll with the idea that indie webcasting now is a medium which by its nature is not smooth and not clear. Looking and sounding like early TV experiments of the 1930s and 1940s. That can have its own kind of artistic goodness, it is up to us to discover and use it in ways that work for what it is.


Awful (technical) truths revealed:

Webcast "Official" version - with post cleanup work

Webcast "Raw" version - as it happened!
Notable moments include:
05:50 - 06:15 - John (left) concentrates on focussing a webcam from hell with his intense performance distracting from the presenting work of Daniel and Alexandra.
44:20 - 45:20 - Audio disappears for no apparent reason
45:20 - 49:20 - Achievement! Incorporated video clip!

Before webcast - technical rehearsal number 8 - audio echoes!
Demo of why webcasting is mad. Just when I thought we had it all together, I do this test. It is 12 min long but you only need to play the first 2 minutes to reveal yet another technical challenge rearing its ugly head - audio echoes on playing a clip.
Solved this, eventually, by bringing in extra software "SplitCam"


Wise after the event:

Additional info and resources discovered late or after the event.

Info: "finding a camcorder that works with skype is harder than you might expect"
Aha! We are not alone in finding this challenging! Makes us feel better! Writer David Gewirtz shares experiences like ".. couldn't get the setup to run reliably enough for my studio needs.." .. "It's really weird that flash-based camcorders just don't support live video, especially given how popular Skype and other live video services have become."